Your Ad Here

Sac City Council disagrees with TSN troll regarding participation in government


SAC CITY, IOWA – DECEMBER 27, 2010

So I got this particular piece of crazy in the mail from someone who cared enough to use the snail mail.
Note the crooked stamp and serial killer crazy writing.
122710SCCDOC0001

On the back side you can see where he was a little obsessed with making sure that the letter didn’t fall out utilizing both saliva and tape to hold that those pieces of paper in.
122710SCCDOC0002

As you can see from the last letter that this fan sent, he has since changed his mind and decided to start thinking of what I do as “news”
122308SCCDOC0003
…I wonder if he’s still throwing my “reports” away. I hope that the people that feed this guy print out the website on sheets of paper so he can still experience that particular pleasure.

So anyway, here is the letter he sent this year…
122710SCCDOC0004

Cutting away the unintelligible bits that have to do with maintenance schedules, etc., the underlying message of this TSN fan seems to be that people who do not own property do not deserve the right to participate in the conversation about the issues facing Sac City, Iowa.

The Christmas meeting of the Sac City Council was scheduled to be pretty dry and procedural, so I decided to attend the meeting, read the letter, and ask them if they agree with this concept.

It turns out, and you can watch the video for yourself, the council generally seems to feel that everyone who is interested in our community is welcome to participate in the public discourse surrounding the issues regardless of property ownership or residency.




Copyright (c)2007-2010 Curtis Bloes All Rights Reserved

Comments :
1. Keep it civil and stay on topic.
2. Some profanity will be allowed if deemed editorially relevant.
3. No harassment of private citizens will be allowed.
4. Criticism and praise of elected officials is encouraged.
5. Any handle that appears to be a real first and last name will be changed to the first name only unless it is a registered handle.
6. If your comment wasn't posted within a few hours, then it was probably deleted.

2 comments:

  1. The argument that if you're not a landowner you don't get a voice is ridiculous. If you're a renter property tax is still part of what you pay, it's just going through an intermediary, the landlord. If property taxes doubled or tripled you can rest assured all rent would go up to cover it. Same goes for utilities. Renters contribute as much to the city and utilities as landowners do.

    tk

    ReplyDelete
  2. The writer also seems to imply that you should get a voice ONLY if your name is listed on the deed to a property, or your name is on the receipt for property taxes. That would exclude a lot of families - married or not - where one party owned the house before the other moved in, and the second party's name was never added to the property listing. That second party might be the one paying 100% of the tax, but for whatever reason, the deed is in someone else's name.

    ReplyDelete