Sac County Supervisors debate the pros and cons of establishing urban revitalization plans
SAC CITY, IOWA – JULY 6, 2010
1. The argument against is that it would not allow the county to have any control about who gets to utilize the abatement aspect.
- The asked for abatement is pretty heavy handed and would deny the county taxes for years.
- business (Farmers Coop) is going to move in even if the abatement is not approved.
2. Naturally the no-trick ponies in charge of bringing business to the county (what businesses?) are desperately grasping at the special treatment option.
--Look for the future lie in some unscrupulous local newspaper claiming responsibility for “bringing this business in” in when it was actually a purely geographic consideration.
Copyright (c)2007-2010 Curtis Bloes All Rights Reserved
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top 10 Posts
- Minutes of the May 17, 2010 Joint East Sac County School Board Meeting, WLVA
- Mona Wehde's testimony at the Tracey Richter trial - Part 2
- January 27, 2011 was a great night to be a ESC Raider Wrestling Fan
- Minutes of the January 23, 2012 Auburn City Council Meeting
- Minutes of the July 6, 2010 Lake View City Council Meeting
- Early City Council discusses ways to make City Hall more comfortable in the event of an emergency
- Lake View city council reveals new proposed higher utility rates
- East Sac County School Board approves a comprehensive school improvement plan
- VIDEO John Torbert updates Sac County Supervisors on details of Monona County -vs- IDNR
- #escraiders baseball team beat South Central Calhoun 5-4 on June 29, 2011 @ #saccityia
No comments:
Post a Comment