Iowa House proposes sweeping Jim Crow style law discriminating against a wide spectrum of people, including but not limited to homosexuals
Following is an excerpt from House Study Bill 50.
"This bill creates the religious conscience protection Act. The bill provides exemptions for religious corporations, associations, educational institutions, societies, charities, and fraternal organizations, and individuals employed by such entities while acting in the scope of employment, from any requirement to solemnize a marriage, treat a marriage as valid, or provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for purposes related to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage, if by doing so would cause such entity to violate the sincerely held religious beliefs to which the entity subscribes or the individual to violate the individual's sincerely held religious beliefs..."
Read the full bill - H.S. 50
Copyright (c)2007-2011 TheSacNews.com Inc. All Rights Reserved
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top 10 Posts
- Mona Wehde's testimony at the Tracey Richter trial - Part 2
- Lake View city council reveals new proposed higher utility rates
- East Sac County School Board approves a comprehensive school improvement plan
- Black Top Service Co, Pavement Doctor compete for street repair jobs in Auburn, Iowa
- Minutes of the July 6, 2010 Lake View City Council Meeting
- East Sac County PTO publically thanked for donation of “No Referral” medals
- Check out the band "Bound 2 B" playing tonight at the Sac Country Club!
- FIRST LOOK: July 25, 2011 Sac City Council Meeting
- Early City Council discusses ways to make City Hall more comfortable in the event of an emergency
- 14 more photos of the April 13, 2011 Sac County Tornado Cleanup day by Beth Litterer
Actually its not discriminating necessarily as much as it is protecting the right of say, the baptist church, from having to recognize and provide for something that is very clearly against its beliefs.
ReplyDeleteYou aren't reading it deeply enough.
ReplyDeleteNo church is currently required to perform a marriage ceremony that is against its beliefs. If that's what they're trying to do, it's an unnecessary law. But there's clearly more going on here, so not only is it unnecessary, it's also quite likely unconstitutional.
ReplyDelete